Recently I came across a case where users reported intermittent failures for a business-critical app.
No packet loss.
No bandwidth issues.
No firewall resource alerts.
The root cause?
👉 False positive drops due to Layer 7 (App-ID / Threat inspection).
When Palo Alto performs L7 inspection, it doesn’t just look at ports — it deeply inspects the payload:
App-ID
IPS
Anti-Spyware
Vulnerability Protection
URL Filtering
SSL Decryption
Sometimes, legitimate application traffic matches a threat signature pattern incorrectly — resulting in false positives and session resets.
How to identify this in Palo Alto
Check:
Traffic logs → action = reset / drop
Threat logs → same session ID
Look for:
vulnerability, spyware, file-blocking
Repeated hits for a known safe application
This is your biggest indicator of an L7 false positive.
How to fix / exclude safely (the right way)
Instead of blindly disabling security profiles:
Option 1 – Signature exception (Best practice)
Create an exception for the specific signature:
Objects → Security Profiles → Vulnerability / Anti-Spyware
→ Exceptions → Action = allow
This keeps protection intact for everything else.
Option 2 – App-based security policy
Apply lighter inspection only for that application:
Create a dedicated rule for the app
Attach custom security profiles
Option 3 – Decryption exclusion (if SSL)
If traffic is encrypted:
Policies → Decryption → Exclude
Only for trusted destinations.
Architect mindset
L7 inspection is powerful.
But blind trust in signatures = hidden outages.
The goal is not:
“Disable security to make app work”
The goal is:
“Tune security so business keeps working securely.”
False positives are not firewall bugs —
they are design and tuning gaps.
If you’ve ever debugged a “network issue” that turned out to be L7 inspection…
you know the pain 😅
This is where a network engineer becomes a network architect.
No comments:
Post a Comment